Request an OpenAI case review.
Tell us what happened. If you or a family member experienced serious harm following sustained ChatGPT use, a case review may help clarify whether the situation fits a developing legal category. David Meldofsky refers your request to participating law firms where a firm handles your category and state.
Lawsuit Center is the intake and referral practice of David Meldofsky, a California attorney, and provides no legal advice through this site. Submitting information does not guarantee eligibility, compensation, contact, or representation. AI chatbot liability is a developing area of law, and outcomes in pending cases are unpredictable.
Situations people often research.
A small but growing number of lawsuits have been filed against OpenAI alleging that ChatGPT contributed to serious harm. The harms alleged include wrongful death, self-harm, dangerous drug interaction advice, and acts of violence carried out after sustained chatbot use. These cases typically rely on product liability, negligence, and failure-to-warn theories rather than treating chatbot output as ordinary user-generated content.
- Families of a loved one who died by suicide after sustained ChatGPT conversations.
- Families of a loved one who died of an overdose, drug interaction, or other harm after relying on ChatGPT for guidance.
- Families affected by a mass-casualty event allegedly preceded by the user's ChatGPT use.
- Individuals who experienced a serious mental health crisis, hospitalization, or self-harm event following sustained ChatGPT use.
- People who suffered injury after relying on ChatGPT for medical, mental health, drug interaction, or safety information.
- Family members researching a claim on behalf of someone who cannot research it themselves.
OpenAI case review form.
Start with the category that best fits, then briefly describe what happened. Contact information is requested so the firm David refers your request to can follow up.
What happens next.
Your information is used to match your request to an active lawsuit category and to a participating law firm in your state.
If there appears to be a possible fit, David refers your request to a participating law firm, and that firm may contact you to ask for more information.
No attorney-client relationship is formed unless and until you sign an agreement directly with a law firm.
The OpenAI litigation landscape.
Lawsuits filed against OpenAI to date allege that ChatGPT contributed to harm in several ways. Some say it provided information used to plan acts of violence. Others say it encouraged or instructed on self-harm, or gave drug interaction or medical advice that led to overdose or injury. Several say it fostered psychological dependency in vulnerable users without adequate safeguards. The complaints generally bring product liability (design defect and failure to warn), negligence, and wrongful death claims under state law.
Most of these cases are at an early stage. None has yet been resolved on the merits. Three questions are contested in most of them. Is ChatGPT output a "product" under traditional products liability law? Does Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act shield OpenAI from liability for chatbot-generated content? Does the First Amendment add protection on top of that? The answers to those questions will shape what is and is not a viable claim.
For background on the specific cases that have been filed and the legal questions they raise, the educational articles at Lawsuit Informer provide attorney-led commentary written for non-lawyers.
Read this before submitting.
Lawsuit Center is the intake and referral practice of David Meldofsky, a California attorney, and provides no legal advice through this site. Submitting information creates no attorney-client relationship. It does not guarantee that you qualify for a claim, that compensation will be available, or that any law firm will offer representation.
AI chatbot liability is a developing area of law. The legal theories being advanced in the pending cases against OpenAI have not yet been resolved by appellate courts. Outcomes are unpredictable, and a viable-looking case under current pleadings may not survive a motion to dismiss or a later substantive ruling.
This page is attorney advertising. It is not a recommendation or endorsement of any attorney or law firm.
Legal deadlines for these claims can vary by state and can be short. If you believe you may have a claim, consider speaking with a licensed attorney as soon as possible.